Jason (jcreed) wrote,

Grah, mysterious coverage error. I have a theorem that coverage-checks when I have a "hole" term at the type the theorem is supposed to output. The theorem consists of two mutually recursive statements A and B. If I add clauses to A (hoping to eventually remove the "hole" cases), then there are new missing cases reported for B. Insane!


ETA: Have found a way around it this time... the solution unfortunately isn't that general.
Tags: twelf, work

  • (no subject)

    Well I am certainly glad I saw Arrival so that I get the wug joke in http://languagelog.ldc.upenn.edu/nll/?p=29480#more-29480

  • (no subject)

    Saw "Arrival". It did have some nontrivial linguistics content, but it still felt kind of wrapped up in a discernible layer of Hollywood Woo. The…

  • (no subject)

    Had some dinner at Aliada with akiva and sasha and K, and afterwards saw Herzog's "Aguirre, the Wrath of God" in Socrates park. Enjoyably bleak.

  • Post a new comment


    Anonymous comments are disabled in this journal

    default userpic

    Your reply will be screened

    Your IP address will be recorded