Jason (jcreed) wrote,

Grah, mysterious coverage error. I have a theorem that coverage-checks when I have a "hole" term at the type the theorem is supposed to output. The theorem consists of two mutually recursive statements A and B. If I add clauses to A (hoping to eventually remove the "hole" cases), then there are new missing cases reported for B. Insane!


ETA: Have found a way around it this time... the solution unfortunately isn't that general.
Tags: twelf, work

  • (no subject)

    Guy from Seattle team we've been working with showed up today at work; no matter how much I'm generally comfortable working with remote teams (and I…

  • (no subject)

    Sean's back in town --- good fun working with nonremote teammates.

  • (no subject)

    Sean's in town at work, good times.

  • Post a new comment


    Anonymous comments are disabled in this journal

    default userpic

    Your reply will be screened

    Your IP address will be recorded