Speaking of which, I am getting might stuck on this proof. I came up with this one approach which totally destroyed a problem I thought was hard --- relating the more algebraic presentation of the bunched additive implication to the more modal presentation of it. The approach is very simple once you get it going; all the action happens inside the logic itself, and you just turn the crank of cut elimination to do the heavy lifting. But then I slowly realized the ostensibly easy, already solved problem --- relating the classical modal calculus to the intuitionistic one --- is still very hard in this setting. Grr.
Speaking of which, I am getting might stuck on this proof. I came up with this one approach which totally destroyed a problem I thought was hard --- relating the more algebraic presentation of the bunched additive implication to the more modal presentation of it. The approach is very simple once you get it going; all the action happens inside the logic itself, and you just turn the crank of cut elimination to do the heavy lifting. But then I slowly realized the ostensibly easy, already solved problem --- relating the classical modal calculus to the intuitionistic one --- is still very hard in this setting. Grr.
-
(no subject)
A paper on describing circuits in an agda DSL: http://www.staff.science.uu.nl/~swier004/publications/2015-types-draft.pdf
-
(no subject)
Going more carefully now through this little tutorial on fpga programming with the iCEstick. It's in spanish, which makes it slightly more…
-
(no subject)
Some further progress cleaning up the https://xkcd.com/1360/ -esque augean stables that is my hard drive. Tomato chicken I made a couple days ago…
- Post a new comment
- 6 comments
- Post a new comment
- 6 comments
