Speaking of which, I am getting might stuck on this proof. I came up with this one approach which totally destroyed a problem I thought was hard --- relating the more algebraic presentation of the bunched additive implication to the more modal presentation of it. The approach is very simple once you get it going; all the action happens inside the logic itself, and you just turn the crank of cut elimination to do the heavy lifting. But then I slowly realized the ostensibly easy, already solved problem --- relating the classical modal calculus to the intuitionistic one --- is still very hard in this setting. Grr.
Speaking of which, I am getting might stuck on this proof. I came up with this one approach which totally destroyed a problem I thought was hard --- relating the more algebraic presentation of the bunched additive implication to the more modal presentation of it. The approach is very simple once you get it going; all the action happens inside the logic itself, and you just turn the crank of cut elimination to do the heavy lifting. But then I slowly realized the ostensibly easy, already solved problem --- relating the classical modal calculus to the intuitionistic one --- is still very hard in this setting. Grr.
-
(no subject)
More things to add to the "chord progressions that aren't cliches-I-already-know-about nonetheless covertly appearing in multiple places" file.…
-
(no subject)
Consider the chord motion in Lights's "Cactus In The Valley" that happens around 49s in: v link goes here | F G C C | F G C C | F G Am D7 | F G…
-
(no subject)
Cute little synth widget playground: https://blokdust.com/
- Post a new comment
- 6 comments
- Post a new comment
- 6 comments