Jason (jcreed) wrote,
Jason
jcreed

Will people never stop conflating correlation and causality?

Imagine the folloving theory: some people experience more severe memory loss than others due to alcohol. Given X amount of alcohol, these people are also more likely to black out. Doesn't this adequately (and even naturally) explain the data described in the article, without any causal relationship between drinking enough to black out and future memory impairment? I'm not saying that I think the conclusion is all that improbable, just that the methodology sucks.
Subscribe
  • Post a new comment

    Error

    Anonymous comments are disabled in this journal

    default userpic

    Your reply will be screened

    Your IP address will be recorded 

  • 4 comments