Jason (jcreed) wrote,
Jason
jcreed

Modules systems was rather annoying. I was hoping Derek's talk would be a nice overview of things, since it's sort of a dry run for his proposal talk, but instead much of the class was Bob and Derek arguing loudly over issues that I'm sure were very relevant and important, but I didn't understand any of them. Too bad I haven't actually kept up with the class, but I'm not too surprised I haven't found the motivation to since I'm only auditing. Maybe andrew will insist it's just as well I didn't get caught up in the seamy underworld of desiging type systems for modules.

Some stuff about interactive proofs and arthur-merlin proofs and PSPACE and things in complexity theory. Proofs so hardcore they don't even have time to present them in class except in watered-down form. Yikes. Rudich went off on a long philosophical tangent at the end of class. I still don't see a clear distinction between "behaviorism" and "materialism" and "mechanism"... all seem like rejections any funny dualistic goings-on. What does it even mean to ask for a mechanistic explanation of true epiphenomenal consciousness?

Apart from that, wrote and played with a little bit of audio synth code again. My life is so exciting sometimes.
Subscribe

  • (no subject)

    http://badconlangingideas.tumblr.com/ is the best use of tumblr

  • (no subject)

    Oh my god, I knew that old metalleus joke about deriving moses from middletown was old, since I'd first heard of it through usenet, ferchrissakes,…

  • (no subject)

    Had another brief spurt of NLP-amateur-hour times. The topic this time was "Zipf's law" which is an empirically observed regularity that the nth…

  • Post a new comment

    Error

    Anonymous comments are disabled in this journal

    default userpic

    Your reply will be screened

    Your IP address will be recorded 

  • 2 comments