Jason (jcreed) wrote,

This reddit thread on 'I' vs. 'me' in English makes me wonder why it's so easy to get this wrong.

So we all know that it goes:

(1) That's a picture of my sister and me.
(2) *That's a picture of my sister and I.

(3) My sister and I went swimming.
(4) *My sister and me went swimming.

But people do say the *'ed things — I think I even hesitate sometimes. Is it possible that people who say (4) think of 'and' not as a conjunction but a more preposition-like thing that governs the comitative?

Even though I can't say
(4a) *My sister with me went swimming.
I can say
(4b) My sister went swimming with me.

In that case, when someone with comitative-and in their head, who says (4), is corrected to (3), what they implicitly learn is "oh, I see, comitative coincides with nominative, not accusative" and it makes perfect sense that they now say the hypercorrection (2).

Any actual linguists reading want to tell me what the real story is here? gregh1983? I'm sure this has been analyzed to death already.

  • (no subject)

    More things to add to the "chord progressions that aren't cliches-I-already-know-about nonetheless covertly appearing in multiple places" file.…

  • (no subject)

    Consider the chord motion in Lights's "Cactus In The Valley" that happens around 49s in: v link goes here | F G C C | F G C C | F G Am D7 | F G…

  • (no subject)

    Cute little synth widget playground: https://blokdust.com/

  • Post a new comment


    Anonymous comments are disabled in this journal

    default userpic

    Your reply will be screened

    Your IP address will be recorded