It seems like things after it (validity, soundess of
algorithmic equality) ought to be clear sailing, but
maybe I'm wrong about either that or the correctness
of my proof, or both.
Did some hacking on the TeX stuff for work.
-
It seems like things after it (validity, soundess of
algorithmic equality) ought to be clear sailing, but
maybe I'm wrong about either that or the correctness
of my proof, or both.
Did some hacking on the TeX stuff for work.
-
(no subject)
Something that's bugged me for a long time is this: How many paths, starting at the origin, taking N steps either up, down, left or right, end up at…
-
(no subject)
Still sad that SAC seems to end up being as complicated as it is. Surely there's some deeper duality between…
-
(no subject)
I had already been meaning to dig into JaneSt's "Incremental" library, which bills itself as a practical implementation (in ocaml) of the ideas in…
- Post a new comment
- 0 comments
- Post a new comment
- 0 comments