Jason (jcreed) wrote,

Finished "The Signal and the Noise". Had some interesting anecdotes I guess but I still found it narratively underwhelming compared to Michael Lewis, and technically underwhelming period. It's in some uncanny valley where my technical expecations are raised really high if you're mentioning things like Bayes theorem, but it never got much deeper than mentioning and vaguely explaining Bayes theorem. I guess this very well could be a good book for people who have little to no exposure to math and are curious how predictions work. (6/10)
Tags: books

  • (no subject)

    After getting home from work immediately appeared to be a traintastrophe in the making, went to see Esther Schor talk about her book "Bridge of…

  • (no subject)

    Thai curry leftovers for dinner. Got a copy of Hennessy and Patterson's textbook on Architecture, and I am enjoying catching up on all the low-level…

  • (no subject)

    There's something about the preposterous difficulty of language learning that I occasionally find paradoxically relaxing. So, obviously, what I am…

  • Post a new comment


    Anonymous comments are disabled in this journal

    default userpic

    Your reply will be screened

    Your IP address will be recorded