Jason (jcreed) wrote,
Jason
jcreed

Woo ~5σ evidence of a Higgs-like particle! That's cool. I keep hearing people say that this means "there's a 99.999whatever% chance that it's really a new particle!", which is just flat-out wrong, though I sympathize, because I used to be really, deeply, face-palmingly confused about posterior probabilities vs. frequentist confidence intervals/p-scores/significance testing etc. too. Like, as recently as 2009, when I totally fucked up a phone interview question about it. Now, however, thanks in part to the differential privacy stuff I worked on at Penn, (the definition of differential privacy has an essentially frequentist idea at its core, and resists bayesian interpretations) I am moderately less confused. I think this xkcd is the best, most punchy explanation I've ever read, but The earth is round (p < 0.05) is a fun read, too.

Went over to Dannel's for some good independence day grillin' times. Played some Johann Sebastian Joust for the first time. I think it's a neat idea and I'm glad it was invented, but for me personally it perfectly combines the things that make me feel like I'm Bad At Sports and Bad At Videogames.
Tags: food, games, physics, social
Subscribe

  • (no subject)

    Something that's bugged me for a long time is this: How many paths, starting at the origin, taking N steps either up, down, left or right, end up at…

  • (no subject)

    Still sad that SAC seems to end up being as complicated as it is. Surely there's some deeper duality between…

  • (no subject)

    I had already been meaning to dig into JaneSt's "Incremental" library, which bills itself as a practical implementation (in ocaml) of the ideas in…

  • Post a new comment

    Error

    Anonymous comments are disabled in this journal

    default userpic

    Your reply will be screened

    Your IP address will be recorded 

  • 15 comments

  • (no subject)

    Something that's bugged me for a long time is this: How many paths, starting at the origin, taking N steps either up, down, left or right, end up at…

  • (no subject)

    Still sad that SAC seems to end up being as complicated as it is. Surely there's some deeper duality between…

  • (no subject)

    I had already been meaning to dig into JaneSt's "Incremental" library, which bills itself as a practical implementation (in ocaml) of the ideas in…