In the morning I saw that same Joel Hamkins that I just mentioned the other day give a talk about a "Multiverse View of Set Theory" at a set theory/logic workshop happening today. It sounded as if the audience regarded it as a rather heterodox sort of talk, but it seemed completely commonplace to me to deny that there is really such a thing as a single, canonical, One True Standard model of set theory.
In the morning I saw that same Joel Hamkins that I just mentioned the other day give a talk about a "Multiverse View of Set Theory" at a set theory/logic workshop happening today. It sounded as if the audience regarded it as a rather heterodox sort of talk, but it seemed completely commonplace to me to deny that there is really such a thing as a single, canonical, One True Standard model of set theory.
-
(no subject)
Oh jeez Boulet, this is what you casually slap together for a 24-hour comic? Come on, now, you're just showing off. (But seriously it is so cute)
-
(no subject)
Compare: (a) Borges's Celestial Emporium of Benevolent Knowledge. (b) Today's smbc. --- A further example of excellent linguistic trolling…
-
(no subject)
Le Ballon Rouge
- Post a new comment
- 27 comments
- Post a new comment
- 27 comments
-
(no subject)
Oh jeez Boulet, this is what you casually slap together for a 24-hour comic? Come on, now, you're just showing off. (But seriously it is so cute)
-
(no subject)
Compare: (a) Borges's Celestial Emporium of Benevolent Knowledge. (b) Today's smbc. --- A further example of excellent linguistic trolling…
-
(no subject)
Le Ballon Rouge
