*I think triangle A is encodable as forall a . Ua exists b . FbUaFbA for UxA = x -o A and Fx = x tensor A, where the quantifiers range over positive atoms. See how tantalizingly close that is to already being two monads syntactically? The UFUF pattern going on there? It's driving me crazy.
*I think triangle A is encodable as forall a . Ua exists b . FbUaFbA for UxA = x -o A and Fx = x tensor A, where the quantifiers range over positive atoms. See how tantalizingly close that is to already being two monads syntactically? The UFUF pattern going on there? It's driving me crazy.
-
(no subject)
Guy from Seattle team we've been working with showed up today at work; no matter how much I'm generally comfortable working with remote teams (and I…
-
(no subject)
Something that's bugged me for a long time is this: How many paths, starting at the origin, taking N steps either up, down, left or right, end up at…
-
(no subject)
Sean's back in town --- good fun working with nonremote teammates.
- Post a new comment
- 0 comments
- Post a new comment
- 0 comments