Jason (jcreed) wrote,

FP Lunch is a nice blog for mathy/PL/FP things.

I totally rewrote that note about focusing. It is still missing some details I didn't feel like grinding through, but it's much more readable, and makes the point I didn't realize I should have been making all along, that 90% of the reasoning is just about adjoints, and only 10% of it is about focusing in particular.

The punch line is still that focusing discipline is nothing other than "inverting discipline" (where invertible rules must be eagerly decomposed) where up and down shift are interpreted as p-tensor and p-lolli.
Tags: focusing, functional programming, math, work

  • (no subject)

    Something that's bugged me for a long time is this: How many paths, starting at the origin, taking N steps either up, down, left or right, end up at…

  • (no subject)

    Still sad that SAC seems to end up being as complicated as it is. Surely there's some deeper duality between…

  • (no subject)

    I had already been meaning to dig into JaneSt's "Incremental" library, which bills itself as a practical implementation (in ocaml) of the ideas in…

  • Post a new comment


    Anonymous comments are disabled in this journal

    default userpic

    Your reply will be screened

    Your IP address will be recorded 

  • 1 comment