Jason (jcreed) wrote,
Jason
jcreed
I wrote a short note about the focusing proof I thought of the other day and put it up on my drafts page. I revised it so that it doesn't actually have anything to do with funny cointuitionistic lax logic anymore; that was a red herring. It's just linear logic where you interpret uparrow as q-tensor-blank and downarrow as q-lolli-blank.

It's an awfully lovely bit of math to my aesthetic sense. Too bad I can't find time to work on it more, or, more to the point, find much more of consequence to say about it. It's not like we didn't know focusing was complete already. I just like compressing the proofs like hell until they make sense to me.
Tags: math
Subscribe

  • (no subject)

    Something that's bugged me for a long time is this: How many paths, starting at the origin, taking N steps either up, down, left or right, end up at…

  • (no subject)

    Still sad that SAC seems to end up being as complicated as it is. Surely there's some deeper duality between…

  • (no subject)

    I had already been meaning to dig into JaneSt's "Incremental" library, which bills itself as a practical implementation (in ocaml) of the ideas in…

  • Post a new comment

    Error

    Anonymous comments are disabled in this journal

    default userpic

    Your reply will be screened

    Your IP address will be recorded 

    Help
  • 7 comments