I have this notion that the proof irrelevance modality ought to be logically equivalent to the composition of two distinct monads — just enough to cause it to not be idempotent — but I can't prove one direction of the equivalence I expect to hold.
I have this notion that the proof irrelevance modality ought to be logically equivalent to the composition of two distinct monads — just enough to cause it to not be idempotent — but I can't prove one direction of the equivalence I expect to hold.
-
(no subject)
More things to add to the "chord progressions that aren't cliches-I-already-know-about nonetheless covertly appearing in multiple places" file.…
-
(no subject)
Consider the chord motion in Lights's "Cactus In The Valley" that happens around 49s in: v link goes here | F G C C | F G C C | F G Am D7 | F G…
-
(no subject)
Cute little synth widget playground: https://blokdust.com/
- Post a new comment
- 0 comments
- Post a new comment
- 0 comments
