Jason (jcreed) wrote,

I think I have have found the final piece in an idea for a super-slick proof of focussing's correctness I thought of last November. Chances it will fail are reasonably high, but I am optimistic.


Have gone through the proofs at a fairly low level of detail, and the things that really ought to fail if I'm wrong aren't failing. The only problems are with how I'm using the exponential - this is extremely encouraging.
Tags: math

  • (no subject)

    Well I am certainly glad I saw Arrival so that I get the wug joke in http://languagelog.ldc.upenn.edu/nll/?p=29480#more-29480

  • (no subject)

    Saw "Arrival". It did have some nontrivial linguistics content, but it still felt kind of wrapped up in a discernible layer of Hollywood Woo. The…

  • (no subject)

    Had some dinner at Aliada with akiva and sasha and K, and afterwards saw Herzog's "Aguirre, the Wrath of God" in Socrates park. Enjoyably bleak.

  • Post a new comment


    Anonymous comments are disabled in this journal

    default userpic

    Your reply will be screened

    Your IP address will be recorded