Jason (jcreed) wrote,

Some discussion with neelk today led me to stumble on a 2001 paper by Kopylov and Nogin having to do with classical reasoning and "squash types", which are maybe not identical with but quite closely related to proof irrelevance. I haven't finished even skimming it yet, but it looks interesting.
Tags: math

  • (no subject)

    Guy from Seattle team we've been working with showed up today at work; no matter how much I'm generally comfortable working with remote teams (and I…

  • (no subject)

    Sean's back in town --- good fun working with nonremote teammates.

  • (no subject)

    Sean's in town at work, good times.

  • Post a new comment


    Anonymous comments are disabled in this journal

    default userpic

    Your reply will be screened

    Your IP address will be recorded