Jason (jcreed) wrote,
Jason
jcreed

Some discussion with neelk today led me to stumble on a 2001 paper by Kopylov and Nogin having to do with classical reasoning and "squash types", which are maybe not identical with but quite closely related to proof irrelevance. I haven't finished even skimming it yet, but it looks interesting.
Tags: math
Subscribe
  • Post a new comment

    Error

    Anonymous comments are disabled in this journal

    default userpic

    Your reply will be screened

    Your IP address will be recorded 

  • 0 comments