(no subject) 
[Sep. 18th, 201606:41 pm]
Jason

I think I finally see the actual shape of how determinantal point processes relate to fermions, even though I can't 100% prove it yet. This is apparently where they come from historically, but it's super hard to suss out what the connection is from the recent literature, since they all say "oh yeah fermions, see the original paper" and I can't find the original paper online, and all the middlingold papers are huge wharrgarbls of hilbert spaces and infinite integrals and fuck all that.
I'm a computer scientist! So let's consider the finite dimensional case first. Let's try n=4, even. Suppose you have a particle that can be in one 4 states, say, a>, b>, c>, and d>. Pick any ol' 4x4 hermitian matrix you like for the hamiltonian. This says how much the particle likes being in different states, in the sense of how much enegery it has in them. (At thermal equilibrium, more energetic things are less likely; things like dropping down to lower energy states) For example I could say a> is 5 Joules, b> is 17, c> is 3, d> is 0. But this is quantum physics, so I could also pick some other basis: I could say (a>+b>)/\2 is 50 Joules, (a>b>)/\2 is 1/2, (c>+3id>)/\10 is 3.9, (3ic>+d>) is 100.
But no matter what I say, it's hermitian, so it has 4 nice orthonormal realeigenvalued eigenvectors, and the eigenvectors are the states that have a definite energy, and the eigenvalues are the corresponding energies. Call the eigenvectors U_1, ... U_4. Their coordinates in terms of the basis vectors a>, b>, c>, and d> I'm going to write like U_{1a}, U_{2a}, etc., so that U_n = U_{na}a> + U_{nb}b> + U_{nc}c> + U_{nd}d>.
I'm going to now consider a larger state space, but still finite, of dimension 2^4, namely the corresponding fermionic fock space. You can have anywhere between 0 and 4 particles, and any of a>, b>, c>, and d> may be present or absent, independently. There's 16 basis states, some examples of which are >, a>, ac>, abc>, bcd>, abcd>. The only trick is that the permutation of the labels actually matters, (this is the "fermion" part) and swapping any two letters yields the same state only with the label flipped. So ab> = ba>, ac> = ca>, etc.
I'm going to define the dynamics  i.e. define a Hamiltonian  on the big Fock space in terms of the one I already picked for the singleparticle case. What are the eigenvectors of the big Hamiltonian? Tensor products  either 0ary or 1ary or binary or 3ary or whatever you want  of eigenvectors of the oneparticle Hamiltonian, subject to orderflipping proviso. And the energies of these 'composite' eigenvectors are just the sums of the energies that went into them.
For an example, imagine the 1particle hamiltonian with eigenvector (a>+b>)/\2, eigenvalue 50 eigenvector (a>b>)/\2, eigenvalue 1 eigenvector c>, eigenvalue 9 eigenvector d>, eigenvalue 0 Then a few examples of eigenvectors in Fock space are: If we take (a>+b>)/\2 tensor c>, we get an eigenvector (ac>+bc>)/\2 with eigenvalue 50+9=59 If we take (a>+b>)/\2 tensor (a>b>)/\2, we get an eigenvector (a>+b>)(a>b>)/2 = (aa>+ba>ab>bb>)/2 = (ba>+ba>)/2 = ba> with eigenvalue 50+1=51 If we take (a>b>)/\2 tensor c> tensor d> we get (acd>bcd>)/\2 with eigenvalue 9+1+0=10
Now we have 16 orthogonal energy eigenstates; we let the system come to thermal equilibrium and sample it in the a>,b>,c>,d> basis. What does this mean? We pick an energy eigenstate at random with probability inversely proportional to the exponential of its energy. Then we observe some subset of a>, b>, c>, d> according to whatever the Born rule says about that eigenstate.
I think the punchline is: this whole game ends up being a determinantal point process with an Lensemble kernel which has the same eigenvectors as the Hamiltonian, but the nth eigenvalue is not the energy E_n, but rather exp(E_n) (or, like, exp(E_n/β) if you want to actually think about the Boltzmann distribution temperature). 

